In This Issue:
Hello and welcome to the latest edition of our e-news letter.

Join the NSHA

Become an Associate Member and advertise in every Issue for only £200 pa!

PAWRS 2010

FEATURED COMPANY - UK Container Maintenance (UKCM)

Skip operator fined £10,000

PRESS RELEASE - Don’t give callers an excuse to phone your competitors

‘Time Team’ technology in war against waste crime

Imprisonment and a Community Service Order Imposed for “Talking Rubbish” in Court

Recycling company fined

Noisy business owner prosecuted

Waste legislation Overview

Council landfill targets 'at risk'

Council may appeal waste management case

London bids to end landfill by 2025

Reduced fuel costs and administration for NSHA members

Peninsula Business Services - Protecting your business is our business



Send to a friend
Subscribe
Contact
manu
Suppliers
Waste Container Repairs
WasteManagement
Insurance
UsefulContacts
jobadverts
classifiedads
nsha_section_icons_Finance
Survey
Do you Feel the skip industry needs a Trade Association to look after their interest?

Yes
No

   
Previous Issues
National Skip Hire & recycling E-News Issue 7

National Skip Hire & recycling E-News Issue 8

National Skip Hire & recycling E-News Issue 9


National Skip Hire & Recycling E-News Issue 13, 05 February 2010
Council may appeal waste management case

Lancashire County Council has said that it is “highly likely” it will appeal against a high court ruling which found in favour of a waste management and disposal firm.

 

The case relates to an invitation to tender issued by LCC to operate and manage 23 household waste recycling centres within its area on a three-year contract with a two-year extension.

In November 2007 following an ‘open-procedure’ process, LCC announced that the contract was to be awarded to SITA.

Environmental Waste Controls, one of the unsuccessful bidders, issued a claim in the High Court, Manchester, for damages under the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 in relation to a waste contract for the Lancashire area.

In a landmark ruling Judge Hegarty QC awarded Merseyside-based EWC damages.

Responding to the ruling, LCC executive director for the environment Jo Turton said: “The council is very disappointed by the judgement in this case. In his conclusions Judge Hegarty found in almost all respects in favour of the council.”

EWC claimed that its tender was more environmentally friendly and guaranteed a higher recycling rate than any other bidder involved in the process. It was also around £3.35m cheaper than that of SITA.

“From the outset, all we have asked that each operator be treated equally,” said EWC chairman Bill Edwards. “It’s been a two-year battle, but we’re delighted to have been vindicated.”

However, LCC maintain that their decision was based on an evaluation of both the price and the quality of the service offered by the contractor.

Ms Turton said: “The issue on which the council appears to have lost is that it took into account the financial standing of EWC and it should not have done so.

“Based on this, it is difficult to understand the Judge’s decision and it is therefore highly likely that the council will appeal the decision.”

Created with Newsweaver